Rightlander vs IntegriShield: which fits your compliance programme?
IntegriShield has been a fixture of US compliance monitoring since 2012, combining technology with a managed-service team across financial services, insurance and education. Rightlander is the better fit when your programme runs across global regulated markets, when iGaming or crypto sit alongside finance, and when you need partner scoring and self-serve workflow on top of the monitoring layer.
Two platforms, two approaches.
Both platforms monitor regulated marketing and turn evidence into takedowns. IntegriShield leans on a managed-service model in the US. Rightlander is a self-serve platform with global jurisdictional rulesets.
Affiliate compliance and intelligence
- Web, social and PPC monitoring across 30+ jurisdictions
- Regulator-ready evidence with screenshots and timestamps
- Partner scoring on 60+ signals through the Quality module
- Network-agnostic, integrates with your existing tracking
Compliance monitoring for US finance, insurance and education
Compliance monitoring, tracking and enforcement combining technology with a US-based managed-service team.
Rightlander vs IntegriShield, feature by feature.
| Capability | Rightlander | IntegriShield |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use | End-to-end affiliate compliance, web, social and PPC | Compliance monitoring with managed-service support |
| Verticals served | iGaming, finance, eCommerce, crypto, healthcare | Finance, insurance, education |
| Geographic strength | Global, 30+ regulated markets | United States |
| Delivery model | Self-serve SaaS with optional managed support | Managed service combined with platform |
| Web page monitoring | Yes, 1.2M+ pages daily | Yes, monitored by team and platform |
| PPC monitoring | Yes, geo-targeted across global engines | Yes, US-focused |
| Social monitoring | Yes, profiles, posts, stories, video, messaging | Yes, included in scope |
| Affiliate rules monitoring | Yes, 60+ signals, ongoing partner scoring | Yes, affiliate copy and disclosures |
| Jurisdictional rulesets | UKGC, MGA, AGCO, AAMS, ANJ, FCA out of the box | TILA, UDAAP and US state regulator coverage |
| Partner scoring | Quantified, 60+ signals, ongoing | Violation history, not a partner score |
| Pricing | Custom by programme size | Custom on request, often bundled with managed-service hours |
| Best for | Regulated brands wanting self-serve global compliance with partner scoring | US-only programmes that prefer a managed-service model |
When each platform is the right call.
No vendor wins every scenario. Here is where each platform fits best.
Choose Rightlander when
- Your compliance programme runs across multiple jurisdictions, not US-only.
- You operate in iGaming, crypto or eCommerce alongside or instead of finance and insurance.
- You want a self-serve platform that your in-house team controls, not a managed-service relationship.
- Partner scoring and onboarding integrity matter as much as violation detection.
Choose IntegriShield when
- You operate solely in US financial services, insurance or education.
- You prefer a managed service combined with technology rather than a self-serve SaaS platform.
- You want a long-tenured US-focused vendor with deep state regulator familiarity.
How teams move from IntegriShield to Rightlander, or run both.
Teams that move from IntegriShield to Rightlander typically want more direct platform control and global jurisdictional coverage. We bring your historical violation patterns across, recreate the rule logic, and put the controls into the hands of your in-house team.
Connect your network
Income Access, Everflow, Impact, Awin, Affise, PartnerStack, Cellxpert and custom tracking through CSV or API.
Configure your jurisdictions
Pick the regulators you operate under. UKGC, MGA, AGCO, AAMS, ANJ and FCA rulesets are ready out of the box, with custom US state rulebooks available.
Take control in-platform
Your team runs scans, configures rules and works cases directly. Optional Rightlander services available where managed support is preferred.